MSN
活力0
在线时间136 小时
阅读权限20
初级会员
- 积分
- 645
- 主题
- 47
- 回帖
- 161
- 注册时间
- 2010-1-24
- 最后登录
- 2011-9-25
|
马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。
您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册
×
本帖最后由 IsaacZ 于 2010-9-27 21:40 编辑
老师,您好。请问这句话怎么分析?Whatever the geometry and complexity of any new arrangements, stability will rest on the weights they afford to competition and co-operation,这里weights,afford,competition and co-operation是怎么样的关系,我没看懂……谢谢老师~~For reference: It is possible to imagine all manner of models for a new international system. Some look to the power balancing of the late 19th century; others to the great power concert that emerged from the Congress of Vienna. In Asia, the talk is of “bandwagons” as smaller powers seek security in the slipstream of larger ones; and of “hedging” – alliances written as insurance policies against double-dealing.One thing seems clear enough. The clean, clinical lines of cold war bipolarity have given way to something a lot messier. Whatever the geometry and complexity of any new arrangements, stability will rest on the weights they afford to competition and co-operation.——The Financial Times |
|